RotorQX1 Aero Road Chainring
Item # RTR001E
- 100% Guaranteed Returns
Free Shipping on orders over $50
What do you think about this product?
December 13, 2018
Will this fit a Ultegra 8000 crank?
December 14, 2018
hey Scott, according to rotor it will not fit the 4 bolt, only 5 bolt from shimano currently.
May 6, 2018
Excellent oval 1x chainring!!!
- I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions
I purchased a 52t Rotor QX1 Aero 1x chainring from Competitive Cyclist. It was a "backorder" item because they didn't stock the 52t size (the largest) and they quoted two week to delivery. It actually arrived in about half that time. My thanks to Competitive Cyclist! I'm using the chainring with a compact (110 bcd) SRAM Red 22 crank. I converted it to 1x a couple of years ago on my composite road bike because I never used the small chainring. I was using a 50t SRAM X-Sync 1x chainring and it worked good, but I never liked the "clean-out" feature of the teeth. You see, the X-Sync was designed for muddy cyclocross racing and the wide teeth have an extra bulge in their side to help clean mud and debris out of the chain. The problem with this tooth design for a clean road application like mine: it unnecessarily increases friction since the chain plates must contact and slide over this side bulge. So I had two reasons to look for a new 1x chainring: (1) I wanted one with smooth teeth. And (2) I wanted a larger chainring so I wouldn't have to spend so much time on my 11 or 12t cassette cog. This would enable me to spend more time with the chain closer to the center of my driveline, again reducing friction. Getting an oval chainring was a bonus -- I'd wanted to try one for years and, when I saw that Rotor made one that would work with my SRAM Red crank, I was delighted. About my SRAM Red crank, it has a five-spoke spider to which the chainring attaches. However, the drive-side crank arm doubles as one of the five spokes and uses a hidden reverse-mounted bolt. This means that the chainring must be precisely 4.0 mm thick so it will correctly fit the space between the four outward-facing mounting surfaces of the normal spokes and the one inward-facing mounting surface behind the crank arm. I'm pleased to report the oval Rotor QX1 Aero chainring does perfectly, making it one of the few 1x chainrings (apart from the SRAM X-Sync) that will fit a Red crank. As a "rule of thumb", Rotor says that the wide part of the oval is the equivalent to the actual tooth count plus two. And the narrow part of the oval is the equivalent to the actual tooth count minus two. This means that my 52t oval chainring effectively acts like a 54t chainring when I'm pulling the most chain through the most powerful downward portion of my pedal stroke. And it acts like a 50t chainring when I'm pulling the least chain through the weakest portion of my pedal stroke across the top and bottom. However, it's my understand that this "thumb rule" is based on a 10% oval and this QX1 Aero chainring actually has a slightly more aggressive 12.5% oval. So, I guess the the effect would be a little greater. As for how this chainring "feels". Honestly, I'm surprised how little difference I actually feel. My first two rides (25 miles each for a 50 mile total) seemed perfectly "normal" except I could tell that I was working with a larger chainring. But after the first 25-mile ride (which consisted of HIIT reps (high intensity interval training), I immediately felt like different portions of my legs were sore. It was as if I had been using my leg muscles differently and they were letting me know. After a good stretch and one rest day, I did my next 25-mile HIIT session and noticed no unusual soreness at all. Evidently, my legs has adapted after just the first session. As for power, my average and work-reflected (WR) power for the first workout were normal (within 1 watt of the same workout on my previous round 50t chainring). But on my second workout (after my legs had adapted), my power was 14 watts higher. Since I'm just starting to use my first-ever oval chainring, I'm not going to draw any conclusions yet. But it would be nice to see that the power increase is real and due to the oval chainring. But, even if it is for me, I wouldn't expect it to be the same for everyone else because oval chainrings don't appear to help all cyclists. I guess it depends on how you pedal.
June 3, 2018
Update 06-Jun-2018: I've put about 500 miles on my 52t Rotor QX1 since my original review above. I'm very happy with it and never plan to go back to a round chainring. It only took a couple of rides to feel "normal" on level roads. Where I notice the real difference is climbing hills. It makes it seem easier, like I'm using a 50t chainring instead of a 52t. And, when I'm smashing 500 watt or more, my knees don't notice as much. Does it make me faster? I don't know. It definitely seems to be a "marginal gain". I think my power may be averaging 1-3% higher but I cannot say for sure that the oval chainring deserves all the credit. For me, the biggest benefit is the increased comfort, primarily when climbing. Most of the time, I ride in a forward-leaning TT or tri position, supporting my upper body on my aerobars. In this position, I found that a 111-degree offset was best (mounting position 4) rather than the general-purpose offset of 108 degrees (mounting position 3). Oval chainrings are not for everyone. But if you decide to try one in a 1x drivetrain, I highly recommend these Rotor QX1 Aero models.