WHAT'S NEW

Previous What's New articles

Statistics and Emotion: Our Final Dispatch on the 2009 Spring Classics

The best spell of the bike race season is now done. Spring Classics season is where the tension between risk & reward is most acute. Unlike the incessant strategic hedging and energy-conservation intrinsic to the Grand Tours, spring is where dagger-in-the-heart aggression is the main ingredient for glory. They're the most thrilling races, they're the most visually dramatic, and it's where our heroes seem most like ourselves: One 30-minute effort where the body screams no -- That one-time brief, impossible conquering of oneself -- Is anything else in life more gratifying?

2009 was an especially good Spring Classics season. In trying to make sense of who rocked spring and who blew it, it seems like there are two valid approaches: One statistical, and one emotional. Our goal here is to sort it all out.

I. STATISTICAL APPROACH. No sport is more resistant to statistical analysis than big-time bike racing. The primary reason is that other than wins, almost no one cares about anything else. What Bill James did to baseball, we have some lunatics (I say that lovingly) who've tried to do the same for cycling. But the truth is that few-if-any fans give a flip about UCI points and most would be hard-pressed to name the last 3 winners of the ProTour and when you see a ProTour leader in his leader's jersey most people have no idea what it means and dismiss it as something akin to the Estonian or Canadian National Champion's jersey.

Ours is a statistically deaf-and-dumb sport, which means that if we dare compile statistics we have no conventions for interpreting them, making it an doubly-dangerous enterprise. So accept our apologies up front for our methods.

I limited the data to the following: Top-10 results in Spring Classics (Milan-San Remo, Tour of Flanders, Paris-Roubaix, Amstel Gold, and Liege-Bastogne-Liege); Top-10 results in major one-day races (Ghent-Wevelgem, Brabantse Pijl, Fleche Wallone; GP E3, Dwars door Vlaanderen, Grote Scheldeprijis); and Top-10 GC results in major stage races (Tour of California, Paris-Nice, Tirreno-Adriatico, and Tour of the Basque Country).

We attributed points to each placing: 1st = 40, 2nd = 25, 3rd = 21, 4th = 7, 5th =6….10th =1. In our estimation getting on the podium is a matter of life and death for sponsorship ROI, hence the precipitous drop-off in points from 3rd to 4th. We then applied a modifier of 5x for the Spring Classics, and 3x for stage races. So, for example, Mark Cavendish's Milan-San Remo win got Team Columbia 200 points; Alberto Contador's win at the Tour of the Basque Country netted Astana 120 points; and Pippo Pozzato's win at GP E3 gained Katusha 40 points.

We did not give points for stage wins at springtime stage races, because in comparison to all of the other springtime opportunities out there, winning a single stage at a weeklong race isn't a sufficient accomplishment Too many losers 30min down in GC win a stage because the GC contenders let them go. That ain't springtime bike racing. That's crying wolf. Maybe it's good enough for the Tour de France, but in spring it might net you a sandwich in the face as you ride by.

So, using this methodology, here's how things panned out for the spring:

Quick Step 659
Cervelo Test Team 574
Saxo Bank 558
Katusha 528
Columbia 394
Astana 360
Silence-Lotto 276
Caisse d'Epargne 267
Rabobank 185
Diquigiovanni 175
Garm*n 125
Liquigas 112
Euskatel 100
Lampre 86
Acqua Sapone 85
LPR 70
Francaise de Jeux 64
Milram 51
Skil-Shimano 34
An Post 25
Vacansoleil 22
Ceramica Flaminia 15
Ag2R 11
BMC 7
BBox 6
Elk Haus 5
Landbouwkredit 5
Andalucia 3
Topsport 1
Verandas Willems 1

What the statistics tell us: (1) The obvious thing is that Quick Step owns the spring. What makes their point total remarkable is that they didn't do a darn thing in the stage races. Their dominance in the one-day race scene is impressive. Given the pressure on the team to perform in these races, their ability to deliver this spring was spectacular.

(2) Given the initial skepticism put on the Cervélo Test Team, the consistency of their performance this spring was a surprise to many. The most dramatic highlight was Thor Hushovd's day at Paris-Roubaix. But in terms of Gerard Vroomen's talent scouting, he killed it by signing Heinrich Haussler from Gerolsteiner. In 2008 Haussler won one stage of the Bayern-Rundfahrt, that's it. His podium placings in Milan-San Remo and the Tour of Flanders stunned everyone. And don't forget his 4th in the Dwaars door Vlaanderen and 7th at Paris-Roubaix. We've seen the future, and his name is Heinrich.

(3) Nobody was a tougher critic of Saxo Bank than me. And while Andy Schleck's dominance of LBL more-than-redeemed the team's spring, the stats prove that Saxo Bank's spring didn't need redeeming. They had no shortage of top-5's and more podium placings than (in my heart) I gave them credit for. In short, their spring was a lot better than it appeared prior to LBL.

(4) Katusha's fourth-place finish in our standings is another case of team over-achievement. Much of Katusha's hopes for success this spring were put at the feet of specialist sprinter Robbie McEwen. Ghent-Wevelgem and the Grote Scheldeprijis were both races tailor-made for his finishing skills. And while he didn't deliver the goods, his teammates were nonetheless sparkling, including a win at E3 and a 2nd at Paris-Roubaix by Pozzato, and a win at Amstel Gold by Sergei Ivanov.

(5) 100 reasons exist to exclude Tour of California from our list of points-earning races and we considered doing so. Disqualifying reasons include but are not limited to: The race is in North America; the race is in February; bibs 96-168 were worn by riders of suspect relevance nearly all of whom are either too slow, too over-the-hill, or too-stained-in-reputation to ever do a PRO race (i.e. in Europe against Euro PROS who've never heard of a "Sea Otter"); and, lastly, those dipshit "fans" who sprinted up Palomar in sumo outfits who'd be best-served by being clubbed to a pulp then having their bodies burned in the desert still trapped inside their costumes and the heat will melt and marry them and their mylar costume into one flesh. Ah, yes, a boy can dream.

We'll agree that the Tour of California is a spectacle, but calling it PRO is a loooooong stretch and if we rightfully excluded it from our list Garm*n would assume their correct destiny as the statistical equal of Team Elk Haus and Astana would fall between Rabobank and Caisse d'Epargne. But California is Competitive Cyclist's #1 state-by-revenue so for the sake of being politic we'll pretend the race is on par with Tirreno or Pays-Basque even though it absolutely, totally isn't.

II. EMOTIONAL APPROACH. Little Rock is home of the Arkansas Travelers baseball team, the AA affiliate of the Los Angeles Angels. I love going to Travs games. I drink a lot of beer and eat a frightful amount of unhealthy food and my pleasure in being fairly drunk is intensified by the superiority I feel over the boxscore-keeping goofs in the stands who, instead of taking in the inherent pleasure of the game and the carefree-conversation-with-friends it induces and the relative closeness of the predictably mega-hot player's wives -- instead of living these joys they're glued face-to-scorecard, imprisoned by a fear of missing the remotest statistical detail. Data: It's no substitute for joy and the other emotions that make us whole. Which is why the emotional approach is superior to the statistical one.

Hardest Race of the Spring: It's gotta be Liege-Bastogne-Liege. Andy Schleck's attack was courageous, but what made it successful was the fact that nobody could summon the will to chase. Silence-Lotto had 3 riders in the next group, Caisse d'Epargne and Diquigiovanni had a couple each -- and they wouldn't organize no matter how big Schleck's gap grew. It's not that they weren't tactically smart or motivated to win. Rather, they were a bunch of zombies. Shattered, all of them. The final 20km was, in fact, pretty boring because nobody would do anything but ride tempo. I have a new respect for LBL. There's a reason why it's called the unofficial World Championship for climbers. That many 4km climbs -- all at warp speed -- it slays even the best climbers in the world by the end of the day.

Seemingly Easiest Race of the Spring: The obvious answer, of course, is Tour of California due to the density of minor-leaguers in the peloton. But for the sake of interesting conversation let's give the award to Milan-San Remo instead. It's NOT easy, we know that. But 6 hours at 28mph without much in the way of stiff attacks before the Poggio -- the flavor's a bit too much like a hard endurance ride, lacking in the repeated acts of desperation you get from the northern classics. 162 finishers? Can't we add some rain & cobbles?

Most Overrated Monument: La Redoute in Liege-Bastogne-Liege. When was the last time this climb was anything but a late race dick-measuring contest? Even the legendary Bartoli vs Vandenbroucke spectacle in '99 was little more than foreplay. La Redoute causes tons of guys to get spit out the back, but remind us the last time when the winner was launched from La Redoute. And the runner up is Milan-San Remo's Poggio. Again, when was the last time the eventual winner sprung loose there?

Most Monumental Monument: The Arenberg Forest lived up to its reputation yet again this year in Paris-Roubaix. It distilled the field to a handful of true contenders. The scrum leading to the entrance; the explosive crashes within it; the purity of the visual beauty throughout -- Is it bike race Mecca?

Most Dominant Team Performance: Team Saxo Bank at Liege-Bastogne-Liege. They took absolute authority over the race at 90km to go, and on every climb their goal was to obliterate the field. They literally sacrificed one of the riders per hill on each hill in the last 90km. It's this tactic that drained the legs and the motivation from Cunego, Rebellin, Valverde, and the rest of the favorites. And while the counter-attack by Phillipe Gilbert with about 30km to go was vicious, the ease with which Schleck soloed up to him then flicked him proved that Gilbert, too, was suffering from Saxo Bank's murderous pace on the climbs for the previous 2hrs.

Most Pathetic Team Performance: The lads at Garm*n-Slipstream in Tour of the Basque Country. They're a team of time-trialists, which is another way of saying they're trying to be a team for the stage races. What better opportunity to show off their mad stage race skillz than at what's maybe Europe's most long-lived weeklong stage race? Ernest Hemingway spends 3 pages in "The Sun Also Rises" talking about it (it's Pais Vasco or Pays Basque in the book…I forget…The race passes through San Sebastian as Jake Barnes detoxes post-Pamplona fiesta, which in Hemingway's world means that the drinking strictly occurs from 3pm-til-bedtime, not a minute earlier.) Garm*n rewarded American fans of bike racing & of Hemingway with a signature performance where only 2 of their 8 starters finished. The boys in argyle got tummyaches, they wilted in the rain, they missed the long sessions of Wii back in Girona, fuck I don't know why but there are days where I don't want to go to work but it doesn't matter.

Best Photo: Jeremy Dunn of Embrocation Cycling Journal snapped this right after Johan Van Summeren got off his bike at Paris-Roubaix. He gutted himself for Leif Hoste. He doubtless harnessed some secret hope that maybe oh maybe the tactics would play out in a way where maybe he could win. And then he fishtailed into a crash with Hoste and Flecha in the Carrefour d'Arbre. He looks empty here in 1,000 different ways. Graham Watson and Cor Vos and Sirotti get beautiful photos where the race looks like landscape and other shots of bikes that serve as nice fodder for component geeks. But emotion -- interestingly, it's something they rarely capture, certainly not intimately like this.

Best Journalism: Gotta give it to Embrocation Cycling Journal one more time. The physical Embrocation magazine is a bit too cyclocross-focused for my interests. But they did phenomenal blogging for their week in Belgium where they took in the Ronde, Ghent-Wevelgem, then Paris-Roubaix. They did something like 15 posts during their week in Europe. They're one part sociology, one part comedy. Great writing, revealing photos, some excellent short videos. These guys nailed it so well that I've gotta wonder if they should give up on the magazine thing and go whole-hog into online bike race culture journalism. The perma-hibernation at the Belgium Knee Warmers blog gives Embrocation the opening it needs to become the go-to online site for all things PRO. Great job Jeremy.

MVP of the Peloton: Johan Van Summeren of Silence-Lotto. I mentioned above his awesome self-obliteration at the service of Leif Hoste in Paris-Roubaix. But, amazingly, did you see how he did the same exact thing for Cadel Evans up to the final approach of the Mur de Huy at Fleche Wallone? Name me another rider as versatile. He's like a Cuisinart, What would you like him to do to the peloton? Slice, shred, chop, or grind?? You name it, he'll do it exactly to your specifications, Mr. Directeur, and it doesn't matter the terrain or the weather. While riders like Quick Step's Sylvain Chavanel showed equal selflessness, nobody was nearly as useful to their team in every flavor of spring terrain. He rocks our world.


May 04, 2009

Dear Zach from SD: Butt Yank is actually far enough up state highway 64 that it is never considered part of the metropolitan Little Rock area. We're trying to build something in Little Rock, and then some small minded person from San Diego goes and lumps us in with Butt Yank! The ToC is what it is. That's not to say it's not exciting, or great to have racing in your back yard, or what ever else. But it should never be confused with the heat of a pennant race, to mix sports metaphors. The Tour of Missouri, on the other hand.... As that's in MY backyard, I will personally hunt down and stab anyone who so much as CONSIDERS that the ToM is less than the pinnacle of pro cycling. For those bothered by the channelling of teenage-angst-to-excess (personally, it hits a sentimental sweet spot), particularly as it refers to idiots threatening to gore competitors with their stupid longhorn hats, need to shut up and go buy the first Squirrel Bait and Naked Raygun albums.
- Steven, Saint Louis

May 04, 2009

Also, on the Garm*n thing, I think the distaste is coming from the fact that they just don't seem as hardcore. Not that thats a bad thing, the image is good and I love VdV but to me, their is something infinitely more appealing in the Saxobank mentality of coming to races to make it hurt really bad and to just break people. Garm*n plays paintball at training camp and Saxobank plays with live ammunition. I think that sums it up.
- Doug, Atl

May 04, 2009

Gimme a break folks. Tour of California is awesome, so was Georgia (I'm from there.) but is it a real hardcore, true PRO Race?...Maybe kinda sorta, but until some serious Euro pros decide to contest Levi, it won't be. It's a spectacle and a great place for domestic U.S. Pros to get a shot at the big time, but it's not on an equal level to any of the short stage races that take place in the Euro spring time. Move the race to April, and then we'll see.
- Doug, Atl

May 04, 2009

Let's be clear, I'm the guy who gave this dude a hard time on the whole merckx thing. I still contend he was 100% in the wrong to edit my comments and he still should eat some crow and his response shows his lack of business acumen. I call bull cr@p, though. All these comments on ToC and how you spend 9k on CC and wont ever shop here again. I'm not buying it. Have you guys ever heard of "shop talk?" People in shops have down time, they're into cycling and they have opinions and opinions differ. You all act like what is said here is law. The author is just having some fun - his stats aren't REAL stats, you know that, right? As for ToC, it's a race in Feb and as such it's not a real race - picture a ven diagram - some races are real races, some aren't, but all races in February aren't real races. Sorry. The point - lay off and keep up the good work on the blog. It's one of the better ones out there.
- Tom, DC

May 04, 2009

For those of us who apparently haven't followed this long enough, could you, or one of your followers, please elaborate on WHY you have such a big problem with Garmin and Vaughters, that you constantly feel compelled to insult them individually and as a team, every chance you get? Is referring to them as Garm*n (with an asterix) your way of saying that you think that they are nothing more than a footnote in Pro cycling? As for the rest, usually good commentary and always well written, but you are starting to sound like some bitter old wannabe, akin to the old saying 'Those who can do and those who can't teach' (not my commentary on teachers by the way), or someone with a grudge for the industry. Lighten up, you've got a lot of interesting and pertinent insight that gets cheapened by the seeming lack of justification for the 'nasty' tone.
- Randy, Greensboro

May 03, 2009

I really enjoyed this post, but as usual, the comments are the most fun. It's a little like reading Style Man in Bicycling (the only actual commentary in that mag albeit tongue in cheek). The mixture of indignation, self righteousness and sarcasm is really apropos to PRO cycling. Now I think we can all agree on that!
- Steve, Miami

May 03, 2009

Frank, why don't you write something explaining why you disagree? I agree with the opinions stated above - but even if I didn't would think that it was a well written editorial about cycling. Help me understand your point of view.
- Adam, hamilton

May 03, 2009

Boy some of you guys are really touchy about YOUR big bike race. Does CC really care about being thought of as un-American? Probably not. Does CC care about losing you business? Possibility. I expect that they see the First Amendment as a more potent symbol of what is is the be an American, than waving the flag. Am I un-Australian because I think that the TDU is a joke race like a little staged Belgian Kermesse. Yes if you are flag waving Bogan that thinks Australia is the best place on the planet. No is you value discussion, rationality and you see the world as many shades of grey.
- peter, sydney

May 02, 2009

@Mathew from the People's Republic (read: some hipster doofus from Boulder): I understand what an opinion is. Cheers. Apparently you think all opinions are worthy of respect? Can you be serious?
- Frank, Montclair, NJ

May 02, 2009

I'm DONE. Last year I spent over $4500 at CC and the year before close to $9000 (with a bike purchase). You will never see another purchase from me or any of the dozen or so people I have referred to your site. I just don't get why you are so negative on real american cycling and people out to do the right thing. I would have thought in this economy that it wouldn't be good business to alienate customers.
- Mark, Los Angeles

May 01, 2009

@Frank: with respect, the author is expressing OPINION(S). You find that repellant? The fact that we _don't_ all see things the same way is a blessing, one that political correctness, etc, completely paves over. Thank the Heavens that we aren't all of the same mind, we don't all ride the same route, on the same bicycle, with the same kit, in the same direction, at the same time...you get the idea.
- Matthew, people's republic

May 01, 2009

Man, we get it. US cycling will never compare to the scope of Euro races. I understand that. I don't care if most of the peloton is training or not during the Tour of Cali. the point is they are all racing out her in my own backyard. like lance mentioned, perhaps they can change the calendar and move the toc later in the year. It's the hubris that annoys me. You remind me of that cyclist who just got his new cervelo w/ lightweight wheels and he no longer waves to oncoming cyclist. get over it and move on great site, great blogs! I love the content. it's the best cycling online store in the world
- bill, nor cal

May 01, 2009

I've spent my last dollar at CC. It's a decent shop, and I'll continue to read the website to inform my decisions on what to buy, etc., but whoever writes this blog just doesn't appreciate that he's alienating his customers by showing his bizarre and hateful ways. The four or five folks who have commented about this below is just the tip of the iceberg. This dude's got some issues. His blog could serve a great purpose in the cycling worls, but he chooses to be divisive and ugly. It's small and quite undignified behavior.
- Frank, Montclair, NJ

May 01, 2009

Why all the negativity about the negativity? This blog has come out and said something I’ve been thinking for years now; that most cycling journalism is rewritten press releases and soft ball questions. This blog is great if only because it criticises where criticism is due, but man, go back and read some of the awesome praise it gives riders who ride with their heart on their sleeve and bury themselves in do or die moves regardless of whether they come away with the victory or not. If anything this is writing championing the kind of racing we all wish we saw more of, and doesn’t jump on the victory through TT’s that Garmin eke out just because they are an American team.
- Adam, Hamilton

April 30, 2009

ToC apologists: Get over it. It's a bush-league race. No biggie though. Lot's of people enjoy going to AA baseball, free concerts in the park, and stuff like that.
- PawleeWalnutz, NYC

April 30, 2009

No matter what your take, this is good writing. The author should start a cycling version of The Surfer's Journal.
- Joel, Raleigh

April 30, 2009

Wow! You're an ass ! Why trash the TOC? We're trying to build something in California and a small-minded person from Butt Yank, AR writes that crap! I've attended the last three TOC's. The intensity at Solvang and at the top of this year's Palomar Mountain stage was amazing. Go back and read what Levi or Floyd have to say about the climb at Palomar. Better yet -- come out to California and support American Cycling.
- Zach, San Diego

April 30, 2009

An amusing read as always. Keep it up!
- Mike, Reno

April 30, 2009

seriously - how is the negativity good for business. You've got a good thing going at CC. Don't ruin it by becoming an arrogant prick. If you have a legitimate reason for bashing Garmin, then explain it. You have some great insights and can be very entertaining. Craig - calm this guy down.
- Phil, Little Rock, AR

April 30, 2009

Little too much bashing on Garmin and ToC here for my tastes. It's the best we've got right now, I'd rather not hear people rip into it in a self-important, faux-euro blog tucked into the corner of a retail website.
- Sean, Chicago