WHAT'S NEW

Previous What's New articles

Post Tour of California re-cap

- A lot of great racing happened at the '09 Tour of California. But none was more thrilling than the finale of the 2nd and deciding stage of Tour du Haut Var in France, which took place on the same day as the Palomar stage at the ToC. Check out this highlight reel. Turn up the background porno music loud. If you're pressed for time, fast forward to minute 7:00 of the video. The uphill attacks are sick. Utter violence. How do people race uphill this fast?

- Based on what I hear and on what I read, cycling.tv is effectively dead in the minds of its potential audience. People still can't figure out how to subscribe or log in or see videos either live or on demand. The headaches haven't changed in the last two years with them. What has changed, though, is that people don't even seem to be trying anymore. And just in case you're tempted…step back away from the ledge and instead go visit cyclingfans.com. Each day they list all of the live bike racing being broadcast on the internet, and provide links to the broadcast sites. These guys are angels from heaven.

Occasionally you'll see that certain sites are "geo-restricted", i.e. the broadcasts are limited to select countries. The broadcasting sites determine what country you're coming from based on the IP address of your computer. Does anyone know how to falsify an IP address for a single browsing session, in other words mask my US IP address and instead make it look Belgian or Italian for a day? There's no crime in that, is there? Any tips would be appreciated. I think my favorite hour of the week is making my kids a late Sunday morning breakfast to histrionic French play-by-play of the last 40km of 2nd-tier races like the Brabantse Pijl.

And, speaking of online race coverage, God Bless the Amgen Tour Tracker. The Bloomberg-like festoon of information on-screen is pretty cool, but the fact that it showed live racing from the beginning to end of every stage was intoxicating. Surely there's a business model here for somebody. Cycling.tv is dead, and if the Tour Tracker technology could get applied to the Giro, the Tour, the Vuelta, and a dozen or so one-day races (if not the whole ProTour calendar), I could throw away my TV once and for all. We'd buy banner ads to support it for sure. We'd probably pay for video ads, too. Clearly the web is the future of niche sports broadcasting. Who out there is plotting to make a buck by showing 100 races a year online via the Tour Tracker? Someone step up. Please!

- My favorite moment of the Tour? It had to be the Pasadena finish. Part of it was the racing, but most of my happiness came from the awesome size of the crowd and the families everywhere. How many future bike race champions, now 12 years old, were in that crowd? I think of myself, back in the 80's, standing on the roadside and watching in amazement as the Tour de Trump rocketed past. For who-knows-how-many kids out there, The Cervélo Test Team was to them what Coors Light was to me. Hayden Roulston -- maybe he's their equivalent of David Mann or Mike Engleman. And AG2R's Rinaldo Nocentini, maybe he'll inspire legions like Jan Svorada did for me when he once did a race here in Little Rock. And, of course, the presence of Lance for those kids can't be underestimated. It's like the presence of Lemond + Hinault together at the Coors Classic x100.

I'm thinking less of whether that crowd will spawn American Tour de France stage winners circa 2025. Rather, it's a different sort of champion I have in mind. I'm talking about the kids in the crowd who'll get inspired for the very first time to race a bike and they get hooked and in the future miseries of threshold intervals and rainy base mileage rides they earn a greater illumination about life: the value of hard work, discipline, and focus. These lessons are best learned not in school, but on a bike. The future champions I'm thinking of are in business, in medicine, in law, in the community. What better preparation is there than, at least for a little while, to worship your bike?

- Check out the left crankarm on this Cervélo P3 from a Cervélo Test Team rider. In case any more evidence is required that SRAM Rival (inexpensive as it is) is nonetheless pro-worthy componentry.

- Scan the top-5 of all the ToC stages. US domestic teams had a dismal time of it. Mancebo and Sevilla of Rock Racing had their moments, but they're both former Tour de France badasses, so it's hard to consider them barometers of the real quality of the domestic US racing scene. Aussie Rory Sutherland (Ouch) cracked the top-5 on the final stage. But all in all it was a terrible showing for the 7 American domestic pro squads, and especially so for the American pros on those squads. I suppose it shows how high-quality the field was as a whole, but it makes it considerably harder to take the US domestic scene seriously when this is how they fare when the big boys are in town.

- For those of you who prowl the blogs, the forums, and the other nooks & crannies of the 'net, you probably observed that the most powerful force of the ToC was the relentless vitriol of the Lance-haters. Everything done by Lance, it appears, was indisputable evidence of his lifetime of concealed crimes. He wore a non-conforming rain vest? He had traces of EPO in his 1999 Tour de France blood bags! He shoved a lunatic exhibitionist? He's a shit dad because he's off racing his bike instead of devoting his 30's to playing Sonic the Hedgehog on the DS with his kids! He got gapped at the top of Palomar? His lunches with Michele Ferrari should get him banned from the ProTour for 70 years! The constancy of their hate confounds me. Lance-haters, please remind me, what's your beef with him?

I think it's really and truly a jihad. It's a terror exactly like the one our country is at war against, where the ideology of the "oppressed" can find no satisfaction in this life. The Lance-haters: They are nihilists. What is their purpose of their anger? What endgame, exactly, do they want to see? I have some bad news for them: Everyone who raced the Tour de France in 1999 was on EPO. Do you not understand that? Why the outrage at a fact that no one disputes?

Tell me this: What is Lance's path to penance? Clearly confession isn't the answer. If it were, Jonathan Vaughters wouldn't still be tap-dancing around the issue of his own doping. And if confession reliably earned Christ-on-a-cross-like redemption, Joe Papp and Patrick Sinkewitz could plot their racing comebacks. But, no, a rational path to cleansing doesn't exist for the haters. It's because they're not rational. It's because they're suckers. They're suckers for the would-be eloquence and fashion sense of the preening David Millar. They're suckers for the cuddliness of family man Erik Zabel. The haters think they're la Résistance, but in fact no one has proven more susceptible to the modern-day crafting of character -- where public figures aren't appraised by their deeds, but rather are judged by the packaging job concocted by high-dollar PR firms with their expert media manipulation. Like the fat fuck idiots who run me off the road when I train who honest-to-God believe in "Must See TV": The haters run like rats to their media addictions: The New York Times, Paul Kimmage, "honest" interviews with the spokesmodels of Team Garm*n. Here's what the Tour of California taught me: Lance has no path to penance. Why? It's because there's something the haters hate even more than him: That the world doesn't share their self-righteous outrage. Their capricious use of forgiveness proves that there's no true north for their moral compass.

- Speaking of Paul Kimmage, he of the starry-eyed Team Garm*n worship, let's not forget the fact that in his cri de coeur "A Rough Ride" he makes it clear that he experimented with doping during his own pro days. There's no shame in that. As his book makes clear, life is complicated. It's interesting, then, that he's so eager to play character-assassin to Lance. Stones, glass houses, etc. Why, Paul, why? I have a theory: It's guilt that motivates Paul Kimmage in his splenetic, very public hatred of Lance. He can't stomach the experience of his own personal doping experimentation. It's as though confessing it in his book wasn't enough, and forgiveness can only come through more punishment. Punishment of himself? No way. It's punishment of others who might be guilty of the same.

I can already hear the ripostes of the haters. There's a world of difference, they'll say, between Kimmage's youthful doping dalliance and Lance's methods. I'm sorry, but nary a shred of proof exists of that. In lieu of facts, the haters will compensate with the Great Wall of Vitriol. In the place of due process, they prefer the ease of trial-by-media. I agree that there's a "world of difference" here: It's a talent level that differentiates Paul and Lance. As bike racers. And as effective communicators.

Lance-haters, I appreciate meaningful dialogue. With this in the forefront of my mind, I yield the floor to you, my esteemed colleagues whose second-most prized asset is their David Millar-autographed copies of Rouleur #8 (featuring a glossy full page photo of a freshly-scrubbed, looking-thoughtful DM head-to-toe in Paul Smith at the foot of the Eiffel Bridge in Girona.) Please help me understand: (1) Why the selective forgiveness? I have a soft spot for Kazakh riders. What will it take for you to embrace the no-less-guilty-than-Millar Vinokourov and Kasheckin? And Papp and Sinkewitz? (2) What will cause you to lower your moral crosshairs from Lance? Let's get into the realm of the purely theoretical: If he surrendered his '99 maillot jaune who is the innocent that we'll hand it down to? Jesus, look at that top-15. It reads like death row! How about a Festina rider? A Casino rider? A Mercatone Uno rider? Look at all 141 finishers -- not unlike life, who there is without sin? Let me narrow the questions to this: What is Lance's way to penance? Or would you prefer not to get into that, since forgiveness to Lance would deprive you of your most prized asset, the thing that finally gives you a sense of purpose in life: Your white-hot hatred of Lance.


March 14, 2009

Lance DID test positive during the TdF. He got a post-dated doctor's note to explain it. Supposedly the steroid was for topical anti-saddle sore ointment. If you believe that, you also believe his diatribes in his first book about how he was going to put his kids first, unlike his SOB dad. IMO, Lance doped for the first several years of his career. I believe he figured out after two blow outs in the Tour that he didn't need dope to win. Did his teammates who were so instrumental in his victories dope? The Actovegin bags found by German journalists one year are indicative of the team mindset. That said: those of us who raced Lance back in his junior years thought he would win everything, I have no doubt that he has the physiology and mindset to do so clean. Why am I down on Lance? He is a jerk. I have seen it first hand. Great champions don't have to be a-holes, and his definitely is.
- Greg, Little Rock

March 10, 2009

He never tested positive for anything despite being the most tested athlete in cycling or any other sport. Therefore didn't happen. He is a great draw to the sport and is still getting people interested in and involved in cycling. Not to mention cancer awareness. What can be bad about this? See my letter to the editor in Procycling with Lance on the cover. I think I said all that needs to be said there. You know, maybe a little controversy is a plus now that I think about it. Anyway I enjoy watching his beautiful way of riding a bike.
- Steve , Tucson, Arizona

March 03, 2009

For all of you who are Lance-Haters read this article in Bicycling Magazine by Bill Strickland. After you read it, do you still feel Lance is only coming back for himself? Its not about the person, its about what the person represents. Why don't you relax and enjoy the ride because many years from now you can say you actually saw one of the greatest. http://sittingin.bicycling.com/2009/02/come-back-forev.html Thanks and LiveStrong
- Doug, Raleigh, NC

March 03, 2009

Not a hater here, just sick of hearing about him and hate the way he dictates races he wants to win. Though not solely his style, he perfected it and made the racing bland.
- Brian, Newtown, Pa

March 02, 2009

Here's the difference between a guy like David Millar and Lance Armstrong. One cheated and came clean about it; the other cheated and maintained his innocence. I don't respect cheaters, and you make valid points that back in 1999 everyone cheated, but many (Barne Riis) have confessed, and Armstrong should to. The guy lies about this on a daily basis, and it's mildly disgusting to me.
- Joey, SF, CA.

March 02, 2009

Re Haut Var, there has only been 874 views total of teh clip, and this is real, riders killing themselves, cycling. I guess there just isn't an audience for small-Euro-sans-Lance races in the US. Note the success of Garmin at K-B-K this weekend, Duijn managed 18th, and Maskaant 58th, but Friedman and Farrar were 101 and 102. That's only four finishers. The results from Het Volk were similar. As cool as a TTT is to watch, having one mass start victory this year would be a better indicator that the team is the real deal they keep presenting themselves as than a TT win in each grand Tour.
- Adam, Hamilton

March 01, 2009

I believe what is most amazing to me is that NO ONE in all of these comments have mentioned a WORD about the deciding stage of Tour du Haut Var in France - link provided in the original note. Listen - I take Lance for what he is - and I'm ok with what he is. Anyone who wins the Tour de France 7 times - doping or not - has to be special... BUT the deciding stage of Tour du Haut Var in France - OH MY GOD - what a great video clip. I found my quads filling with blood - could feel the burn - and watching this - you realize how one can be BROKEN mentally by an ATTACK. The strongest rider did indeed win that stage - if you have not watched it (go to 6:30) - you MUST see it...
- Eric, Burke, Virginia

March 01, 2009

So anyone who questions the Lance Myth is a "Hater"? You write, "Everyone who rode the tour in 99 used EPO, a fact nobody disputes" Many people do dispute this and attack anyone that dares question the purity of Armstrong. Can you not see the difference between a rider that admits to doping and works to help make the sport better and one that lies for years and invents crazy stories of French conspiracy theories?
- Bruce, San Diego

February 27, 2009

This is starting to feel to me like I'm reading a weekly Maynard Hershon column. The economy is in the pits, my bonus this year is 5% of what it was last year, and I won't be buying that S1 that I thought I was going to...BUT LIFE IS STILL GOOD. Who cares about Lance when I can get out and ride my bike all weekend? Winter is ending, it's almost March now and the Spring Classics will be soon upon us.
- Phil, Walnut Creek

February 27, 2009

I agree with you Fausto, Jens Voigt is the person to cheer for. Jomo, NJ
- Jomo, Maplewood,NJ

February 27, 2009

The whole point is that if everyone was on dope then, he included, just admit it and move on. It is not about penance or punishment, just the truth is what we want. I just can't stand the hypocracy, the denials, the threats to those that speak out and dare break the code of silence. Some of us "haters" just think it is bad for the sport, your industry and his foundation if he has been lying the whole time. For the average PRO that has a career, makes their money and retires back to their home town to be the top dog in their small town, fine. But to stand on the world stage, role model, make millions and raise millions is different; morality, ethics and truth come into it when you charge for your speaches. Would you give money to the smoker raising money for Cancer? Would you go back to the TOC with your kids and stand in the rain if the biggest star in the sport turned out to be the biggest cheat and liar? I am not jealous, just don't want to be preached to by Millar, JV, Lance or any of them. Just clean up the sport so it doesn't look like pro wrestling to people. I will still stand on the side of the road to watch the race go by even if they are clean and riding 2 mph slower up the mountain. They will still be suffering and some will still be better than others. Drugs don't make it more exciting. You miss the point, most of us are not looking for someone like Lance to hate, we are looking for someone we can trust to be clean to love, respect, admire, cheer for.
- Fausto, NJ

February 26, 2009

Good post, but what's up with the defensive Lance stance?!? It's perfectly logical and even understandable to be an informed and mature cycling fan and not care for Lance. Also, and I hate to say it - no bike retailer should ever comment on people not liking Lance, cause the guy is responsible for bringing a bunch of people with massive disposable income into cycling and given some of the price points in the industry and on your site - there is cause to be biased. Come on, how many products, aside from dope, are actually really performance enhancing?
- Patrick, DC

February 26, 2009

WRT the domestic riders, just because they did not show in the top-5 very often does not mean they are not competitive. Tom Zirbel's 7th place in the Solvang TT is probably worth mention alongside Sutherland's finish on stage 7. Ditto OUCH's Cameron Evans, who rode in two long breaks and looked very strong (and took heat from Jelly Belly's Matt Crane on his missingsaddle blog for his tactics). Finally, Jeff Louder also was frequently on the attack and got very close to the line on one stage. The only team to be truly invisible was Colavita, but anyone could have seen that coming. Kelly Benefits has a much stronger team for stage racing and should have had the invite instead of Colavita. Besides, one can still argue that the reason domestic riders are not on par with the Euro-dogs is due to "preparation". And even if one does not think it is preparation a la syringe, the Pro Tour teams are truly a level above the domestic teams in terms of money and prep. Most PT teams have multiple training camps in the off-season now, compared to the domestic teams who have a quick get-together in January and then hit the races. Not to mention the level of care given to PT riders in terms of physiotherapists, physiologists, aerospace engineers, doctors, chiropractors, sports psychologists, etc, etc. The difference between domestic is there no doubt, but in no way should it marginalize the efforts of the domestic teams and riders. Lance? The comeback does not bother me, just another guy racing his bike out there. I never cheered for him much before his retirement, and probably won't cheer much for him in his comeback.
- Eric, White Rock, BC

February 26, 2009

Speaking of future cycling stars... The Northern California High School Mountain Bike Racing League is starting is 9th season on Sunday. There will be between 400 and 500 high school kids in NorCal racing mountain bikes in Monterey, CA. The League has already produced some great riders (a couple on Garmin; one rider went to Junior World's last year) and continues to grow by leaps and bounds. This is the first year of the expansion into Southern California. Good things.
- Tyler, Oakland, CA

February 26, 2009

Good post, but what's up with the defensive Lance stance?!? It's perfectly logical and even understandable to be an informed and mature cycling fan and not care for Lance. Also, and I hate to say it - no bike retailer should ever comment on people not liking Lance, cause the guy is responsible for bringing a bunch of people with massive disposable income into cycling and given some of the price points in the industry and on your site - there is cause to be biased. Come on, how many products, aside from dope, are actually really performance enhancing?
- Patrick, DC

February 26, 2009

SC, i agree with wanting someone like Vino back. doping aside, it was great watching him ride in 07
- s, shicawgo

February 26, 2009

The Amgen Tour Tracker finally hit its stride this year. The previous versions weren't that great, but the technology has matured and it was by far way better than previous iterations.
- Todd, San Jose

February 26, 2009

Nice post! Looks like you've opened up a can of worms here! I love reading this stuff because it's nice to know that there are others out there who feel the same. I get so tired of seeing "No EPO" crap written on the road, and people who wear "Doper's Suck" shirts. It's not that I agree with blood doping or cheating...I just get tired of it being the focus of bike racing. ALSO....finally an answer to cycling.tv! I totally agree that someone needs to create a site like the Tour Tracker that we fans can watch daily! The Tour Tracker was GREAT during the AToC! Speaking of the AToC...was I the only one who thought that it was a little on the boring side? I'm pretty sure I think that anyway....with all of the great spin the PR people seem to be giving the race, it's hard for me to remember accurately! Lastly....Vino, please come back. I miss your super-aggressive I'll-attack-you-on-a-climb-or-beat-you-in-a-sprint riding! I don't care if you doped or not. I need some excitement in my life.
- SC, Tennessee

February 26, 2009

nice comments! lance haters are only slightly more annoying than lance supporters. the typical lance supporter does not view lance as a steely eyed calculating pro cyclist, but rather as a drug-free captain america-peter pan gay love child. professional cycling is not a healthy lifestyle. everyone from directors, to dr. ferraris, to soigneurs and mechanics are there for one reason only, to make the pro bike racer as comfortable as possible and prepared to do his job. the cyclists who do not have this support system, or have an inadequate or incompetent one are the people who lose, get caught doping or otherwise fail. part of lance's success comes about through surrounding himself with the right people. millar is an appalling idiot because he snitched on himself, snitched on his sport and seeks to profit off of his own lack of moral charachter. armstrong showed his true colors when he chased down simeoni. the sport is a spectacle that has nothing to do with objective reality- and it has its own boundaries....they're changing but somethings are always going to stay the same. pro cycling is a lifestyle that demands a callous vigor and a certain degree of myopic moral aloofness. i don't know if we'll ever see neutral support cars skidding out to try to keep up with riders going up a mountain again, but rest assured the best guys are always going to be killing themselves and their bodies to win.
- c, boston

February 26, 2009

I am not seeing any pics of riders on a P4 or a detailed reniew. What's up?
- Pat, Miami