WHAT'S NEW
Performance vs. Permanence -- Mutually Exclusive?
There is a certain sort of durability to the stuff we sell -- impact-resistant rims, clamp force-impervious bars, framesets with stiffness galore. But durability defined this way shouldn't be mistaken for permanence. I can't say we ever sold a Pinarello Prince Carbon or a set of Zipp 404's with the assurance that 15 years from now you'll still be eager or able to ride it. Take any of the million recent photos from the Tour of California peloton, and consider the tight fleet of bikes you'll see there. In their speed, their iridescence, and their technology…Does any of it suggest forever?
I don't mean this as a criticism. When it comes to pro-quality bikes, "useful life cycle" isn't necessarily inversely proportional to performance. Most of the stuff we sell hits a sweet spot with a reasonable life expectancy paired to desirable ride qualities. Given this balance, then, why do I sometimes crave permanency? It's not the ultimate good. Permanency is just one yardstick of quality, and it doesn't obscure or outweigh the other goods: Beauty, lightness, stiffness, aerodynamics, etc.
Perhaps striving for permanence in my bike just a reaction to growing older. In every photo my hair is thinner. In the battle of essential appetites, sleep all-too-often triumphs over sex. Racing itself is becoming a lower priority than feeling sorta-lean and sorta-fast -- two fraying connections to my bygone youth. Oh, Gianni Bugno and the Stone Roses are long past. Prostate health, monitoring fiber intake, an obsession with death -- I can see those days coming. It's a no man's land here. Like a mid-life discovery of religion, perhaps grasping for permanence in my bike is how I cope with my emerging awareness of my own impermanence.
Or maybe it's something completely different. Have I grown exhausted of being-through-buying? Have I reached my limit with consumerism? Every 6 months for the last 20 years, it seems, I've found myself astride something new. I'm well into my 2nd decade of retail, and I've played psychiatrist who-knows-how-often to others and to myself through varied schemes to cure all of life's problems by buying a new bike. With each bike should come a new thrill and a new dedication to the therapeutic act of training. And if there's only one thing a lifetime commitment to retail has taught me, it's that a new bike solves nothing. Today's new bike is tomorrow's old one. In the wise words of a former employee, "Show me a beautiful woman, I'll show you a guy who's tired of fucking her." And this fact, truer than true, is nonetheless powerless to cool my crush on this one last new bike, a kermesse express that scoffs at both gram scales and tall cols and is beautiful in a Bradley Fighting Vehicle sort of way. Designed by my friend Craig Gaulzetti, seeing it the first time was like an ecstatic vision.
I will build my Gaulzetti with SRAM Rival, an old Deda Newton bar and stem, a Regal saddle, 32/32 handbuilts and 700x25 tires. It's not that I haven't felt the joys of Lightweight tubulars or electronic shifting or lifting an airy 14lb. bike up onto the roof rack. Engineering marvels all, and they deserve to be celebrated. But to check out of the consumerist rat race -- riding, not coveting -- that's a place I haven't visited in a long, long time. Can I make a 20-year commitment to a bike? Is this a bike that can make a 20-year commitment to me? Blessed alloy warpig, soothe me with your endurance and permanence.
Purity, chastity, constancy -- Jesus, these are things that would put Competitive Cyclist out of business if our customers embraced them. Why do I crave it, even though what I'm suggesting here -- deliverance through another bike purchase -- is the great lie? As cyclists, must it always be gear-chasing? My only known peace in life comes at the end of those rare shattering rides that reduce me to a spit-streaked, empty-minded animal. No sweeter state of being exists. That trance, staring into the back of the refrigerator. There. Put me there. Now is the time of year for that pure vacant consciousness. It's a lack of consciousness. Vacancy. Brendan, put yourself there.
March 11, 2009
Good to see you riding a frame which:
a) isn't carbon
b) isn't red, black and white
c) isn't sloped like the old girl's bikes used to be
d) isn't mass produced
- Pete, Owego NY
February 26, 2009
You've probably already read it but for those who haven't, this says a lot aboot permanence:
http://bicyclespecialties.blogspot.com/2009/02/my-1951-cinelli.html
K
- Krys, Toronto
February 20, 2009
Good read (as are most all of your articles) but, it sounds a little like you are spending too much time in the office and not enough on the bike - any bike. Take a break; get out and ride. You'll feel better afterward.
- Rich, Delaware
February 17, 2009
Someone tell me why a Gaulzetti is better than a CAAD9. Oh, it's because a Gaulzetti will be a status symbol and a Cannondale is run-of-the-mill. We're cyclists; we're (mostly) narcissists and having a secret hanshake bike is elitist.
- TTT, Boulder
February 17, 2009
"deliverance through another bike purchase -- is the great lie?"
Yes, but at least you'll have a cool new bike to soothe you when you realise it.
- Ant, London
February 16, 2009
Wonderfully put. My compliments on your style, your subject matter and your website. No matter what materials your next bike will be made of - the little voice in your head that speaks to you about bike projects during boring meetings or long cab rides, is already planning its obsolescence.
- Mike, Shanghai, China
February 16, 2009
A beautiful and courageous article considering this is a retail site - though this is why you have the best cycling website in the world - this is the shopfront of the 21st century - Congrats.
- Scott, Sydney
February 16, 2009
Prediction: the Gaulzetti will become the new MX Leader.
ps. wtf does endering mean, is that when one flips over the bars?
- Justin, Charlotte
February 16, 2009
Narcissism is not an endering trait. Buying a $2000 aluminum frame to prove a point seems to highlight why
- Stickels, Midwest
February 16, 2009
Fantastic post, as usual. The Gaulzetti frames seem like an antidote to the soulless carbon fiber frames that have taken over the peloton. The geometry and design buck any stupid trends and harken back to the proven criteria for making a racing bike. What a great idea!
And to those who think an aluminum frame can't last - I don't plan on giving up my Love #3 in this lifetime.
- David, Boston
February 16, 2009
Craig Gaulzetti is a genius. Someday there will be wispers about the top pros that rebadge his frames.
- Jon, Greene
February 16, 2009
To paraphrase, it's never the arrow, always the Indian.
- steve, miami
February 16, 2009
For a 20-year commitment to a $2K frame, surely Ti is a better choice than Al.
- W, Okemos
February 15, 2009
Permanance? The marketers don't want to hear crap like that. They spend years figuring out how to make "planned obsolesence" generate big bucks. Lugged steel = too heavy, even for the lard-ass weekend punter. Titanium = too soft, even for the weak sister cranking out a whopping 80 watts at full froth. Aluminum = a good "starter bike", what? you too cheap to get CFRP?. CFRP is like almost anything else made out of plastic: disposable and impermanent. It's the way it is...not just in the bike biz but everywhere. New ways to make bikes obsolete: BB30 and related "improvements" in BB design. Integrated seat masts. Asymmetric head tubes. All marketing ploys designed to put your perfectly good current bike into the flea market or the land fill. For every racer boy (or girl) out there that thinks this stuff is the bees knees, there's another racer boy (or girl) that will drop you like a sack of russet potatoes whilst astride a Columbus SL frame used by his (or her) grandpappy.
- PawleeWalnutz, NYC
February 15, 2009
Thanks for pointing out another handmade bike frame maker. I'm looking forward to seeing many at NAHBS late this month (Indianapolis).
Gaulzetti's website simply & eleganly shows just 3 important frame dimensions. The price is reasonable and lead time is very short. But your goal of durability points this rider toward steel tubes, not that there's anything wrong with other materials!
- Sergio, Manitowoc
February 15, 2009
Thank you. Beautiful piece of writing! Back in 1980’s I watched a Ciocc adorned with Campagnolo Super Record at The Bike Shop in Redding California slowly get marked down year after year, gaining dust during the heady days of the mountain bike craze. The bike was still too expensive and beyond the economy of my lawn mowing funds but it represented a technological wonder to my eyes as I imagined chasing Andy Hampsten up the Alpe d'Huez. I think about this bike all the time. It still remains a singular representation of technology, but at the same time with its steel construction in relation to my BMC Pro Machine it has morphed from performance to permanence. To this day I look at Ebay once a week see if I can find a NOS Ciocc with Super Record, but it is more like staring at my youth than anything else.
- Luke , Chicago
February 15, 2009
You speak to to me like no one else has. always exactly what i am thinking. the best cycling web blog on the web when it comes to these sorts of things.
- Benedicto, Kennilworth, CT
February 15, 2009
2000 bucks for a simple non-custom alu frame...... i geuss if you slap on a italien sounding name to anythign you can jack the price up.
i doubt anyone would want to pay 2000 for a bike with a name sounding like ratman or tinkerbell.
- adfro man, cfegt
February 15, 2009
"In their speed, their iridescence, and their technology…Does any of it suggest forever?"
why not start selling Ti bikes again? you used to sell litespeed, right? pick up a new one, Moots, Seven, Serotta, etc...
- sam, chicago






