WHAT'S NEW

Previous What's New articles

Maiden No More: A Review of David Millar's New Book

"…She had learnt that the serpent hisses where the sweet birds sang, and her views of life had been totally changed for her by her lesson." -- Tess of the D'Urbervilles, Thomas Hardy

Racing Through The Dark, David MillarDavid Millar's memoir Racing Through The Dark serves as the long-overdue confessional for an entire generation of bike racers. His downward tumbles -- from amateur powerhouse to exhausted neo-pro; from determined reliance on his own physiology for recovery to the use of injections; from injections to full-blown dopage -- are not portrayed as a morality play. Rather, as David Walsh laid out about Motorola in the late 90's in his (now-vindicated?) book From Lance to Landis, succumbing to EPO was, for many, surrendering to an inevitable exhaustion of resolve and body. Yes, there was a choice: Don't dope and don't race. But for the boys who gave their all from 1996-2005, the calculated consumption of drugs became an absolute requirement.

Racing Through The Dark is the first autobiographical account of the dark emotional calculus that surrounded the use of drugs in the professional peloton. For Millar, nothing summarizes what it means to be a professional more than the million subtleties encapsulated in the word preparation. For countless many in his generation, using EPO was to be prepared. A lack of preparation would represent a lack of professional pride -- which, for most, was a thing far worse than the self-loathing that came from the use of drugs.

Anecdotes of his early-career innocence sting as much as those of his mid-career doping--

"In my youthful exuberance, I was telling anybody who would listen that I'd won [the time trial stage of the 1998] De Panne and broken the course record with a hematocrit of only 40 percent. I went to see [Francesco] Casagrande…so I could show [him] my results.

I stood there, a big grin on my face, expecting Casagrande to congratulate me and say something morale boosting. But he didn't. After a pause, he handed the result back to me and then turned to speak to his roommate…

'Perché non e a 50?' Casagrande asked, puzzled.

'Why isn't he at 50?'"

The book reaches a crescendo in Millar's final years with Cofidis when his professional conscience (i.e. being "prepared") muted any remnants of a personal conscience. His palmares made him the savior for his team, its management, and justified Cofidis' considerable investment in cycling. Beyond this, he was perhaps too fond of his supersized celebrity in Biarritz -- a seaside resort for the rich and famous. Although he is British, Millar had become a golden child of French cycling as a whole. He lived and trained in France, rode for a French team, and put a single-minded priority on the Tour de France.

It was in 2003 that Millar finally become victim to the arc of his success. He abandoned the Tour de France in the Alps after a week of exhausted struggle. In a meeting with his directeur in hotel room atop Alpe d'Huez, his previous self melted away --

"As I took it all in, something shifted in me. I was being asked [by a Cofidis team director] to go to Italy to take EPO. I would then go and win the Vuelta prologue, thus redeeming the team with the sponsor. It boiled down to professionalism.

I was weary -- too weary to fight any more. All that resistance -- all that fighting I'd been doing, all that idealism that at first came so naturally and had slowly grown into a futile and isolating stance -- was now behind me.

I had done well -- bloody well -- as a clean rider. I had stood my ground, done my bit, but now it was out of my hands. The team needed me to accept my obligations, and now it made sense. The tired young dreamer had been waiting for this moment. The background white noise of the struggle to fight doping finally subsided. I opened my mind and let it in.

I walked into that hotel room an anti-doper; I walked out of it a seasoned professional ready to do what was required of me. There was no torment or confusion in my mind…It felt as if a massive burden had been lifted off my shoulders. I was now a professional through and through with bigger responsibilities than my own personal belief system."

In his transformation from ingénue to cold-blooded user, there was an enabler, of course. He's the most interesting character in the book. Millar only refers to him as l'Equipier, thanks to his lawyers, no doubt. Speculation on the identity of l'Equipier will doubtlessly become public sport in the next few weeks. Although Millar never gives his name, he provides enough specific contexts of races and dates that 60 seconds of Google time easily reveals his identity.

From the book it's apparent that he's a veteran Italian domestique. In case you held out any hope that doping wasn't institutionalized on a team level -- particularly in France a half-decade after the Festina scandal -- the presence of l'Equipier will vanquish that notion. Millar renders him darkly, with his villainy made clear early on by the compliments he gave Millar as a neo-pro. Once congratulating him, for example, because his mid-pack finish in an early season race made him the first clean pro across the line.

Aan de start van de E3 prijs Harelbeke in 1999. Other chapters are remarkable as standalone short articles. Millar was a young pro on Cofidis at the same time his teammate Frank Vandenbroucke reached his professional peak. His description of VdB's (and Phillipe Gaumont's) monstrous appetite for Stillnox (a different name for Ambien) and Champagne is frightful. For all of the legend of VdB's iron-fisted dominance at the 1999 Liege-Bastogne-Liege, who knew that he downed eleven sleeping pills the night before?

The happiest surprise of the book is Millar's story of falling in love with the bicycle while bridging his time between England and Hong Kong during his youth. It's arguably the finest rendering in cycling literature of devouring training as a teenager. For those of us who had the same experience, it's a welcome remembrance of that beautiful spell of feeling alive.

The book is not without imperfections. You can feel the pressure of what must have been a publisher's deadline as he accounts for his professional marriage to Jonathan Vaughters and the Slipstream program. Compared to the first two-thirds of the book, the prose here feels rushed. And unlike the private, less-exposed days Millar spent with Cofidis, Slipstream has long been a team defined by its overwhelming PR. There's a familiarity to the current phase of Millar's career and to Slipstream's ethical mission. His role as outspoken anti-doping ambassador is an endpoint most of us already know and don't require a lengthy refresher on.

Racing Through The Dark is transparent, yet unburdened by retrospective apology. It explains the clear-headed rationale of what once was through gripping prose. It's also testimony to the pleasures of reading about an era prior the invasion of social media, when our racing heroes were cloaked in so much mystery. Nowadays, Twitter and Facebook make it seem as though we share breakfast with the pros every day. To have the curtain drawn back on an older world -- one rife with dark unknowns -- is a reminder of what a well-done memoir has the power to reveal.


June 13, 2011

Did Lance read Millar's book?
- Pawlee Brassnutz, NYC

June 13, 2011

I'm with ya Mike and Rapha - both are very valid. Cheating is cheating - but perhaps this isn't excuses as much as just telling the journey from point A to point B, not justifying, but illuminating the issues better? A full read of the book would make it easier to judge the true tone of the writing to see if it is indeed an honest explanation, or just more excuses attempting to soften history's view on Millar/others? I also get the whole once a cheater, always a cheater business, but one has to be allowed to start back down the honest path at some point. They just may do so with an 'honest*' Not too different than professional baseball, just more organized by what we are finding out. Anyway - I don't think anyone is shouting out of an ivory tower here, it's complex enough of an issue that many good, valid points can be made.
- Andy, Minneapolis

June 13, 2011

re: "...thus redeeming the team with the sponsor." This is part and parcel of the problem. It's the racers who get vilified and punished while the puppet-masters like the doctors, team directors, and sponsors go largely unscathed. The entire sport functions on sponsorship money and, rightly so, they want a return on their investment. What real incentives do they have to promote a "clean" sport? It may ultimately be the choice of the athlete to dope or not but all of the coaxers and enablers need to be held accountable as well. Taking real measures to do this will likely chase sponsorship money out of the sport in the short run. Of course, in the long run we are all dead.
- John Maynard Keynes, Chicago

June 13, 2011

Why don't we read the book first, make comments later?
- steve, Miami

June 12, 2011

Millar did it for the same reason all cyclists dope. He wanted to continue his racing career. If he didn't "redeem the team with the sponsors" he and quite a few others would be out of work. A few do give up a racing career rather then dope but it has to be a tough choice if you are really talented, love the sport and know this is the one thing in life not only that you want to do but it's the only thing you really excel at. LeMond said he was happy he raced before EPO and was spared having to make that choice.
- Henry Graber, Miami

June 09, 2011

Indeed, my friend.
- Rapha, Overpriced Villa

June 09, 2011

Rapha, I suspect we are close enough in our thoughts/opinions that we could share a beverage or a ride and afterward be glad we did.
- Mike, SLC

June 09, 2011

Chris--David Millar only narrowly escaped a long term prison sentence--and the pictures are on google when he was arrested and placed in jail. Others--say, those on Cofidis, did not--ironically, the pharmacist and soigneurs are included here. Mike, I appreciate your even tone as much as your depth of thought. But... I too race Cat 4--and I do so quite poorly. Don't have any pretense for claiming otherwise, no aspirations for success beyond Cat 4. I agree with you when you say that it is easier for some to say yes or no, and I'm not claiming a moral ground--high or low--so much as I am claiming a pragmatic one. Cheating is cheating, and if what you're doing is done 'behind closed doors' and gives you an advantage that others might not get--dude, come on... it is cheating. I hear your post modern argument, if that’s what it is, and that is precisely why we have a governing rule to decide these instances... and that body determined sanctions were in order, which they were. It makes them different--but it makes them susceptible to sanctions, jail, loss of employment... if the punishment exceeds the prize of victory, you/I don't need any silly moral assertions. You also need to avoid backing out of it. I reject what some might call Millar's 'refreshing honesty.' I assert he is neither refreshing, nor honest. He cheated. He knew it then, he knew it now, and his mea culpa asserts he was 'worn down.' Bullocks. He wanted to win, and he did, till he got caught. There's no 'moral' anything here... except for his excuse, which I think is lame.
- Rapha, Overpriced Villa

June 09, 2011

Rapha, You may be right about your own experiences. Lots of folks might confront choices and decisions just as you describe. But for others it could conceivably be different. And it doesn't necessarily make them better or worse. Just different. Not right, but different. I don't know Millar, or any pro cyclist personally. I race as Cat4 pack fodder. I don't use PED but I have made other choices in life that seemed acceptable at the time and were later revealed to be less-than-wonderful or even stupid. Illegal even. Maybe the choice to use PED can be seen (by some) as another incremental decision among endless others that confront an aspiring cyclist. Maybe the questions start easy and have little moral or physical consequence and progressively get tougher. You wanna be a cyclist? Then you gotta wear these tight pants. Shave your legs. Ride in the rain. Forget about a muscular upper body. Fly downhill at 50mph. Race so close you touch each other. Keep going when your legs burn. When your heart can't keep up. Get back on the bike after crashing. Back in the race after crashing. Maybe for some people - not everyone, and not inevitably - a string of questions like these soften you for other questions that follow. Do you want to be able to train harder? What if you could recover faster? What if you could be more competitive? What if you could get a result that "redeems" these years of effort? Maybe. I don't know. It doesn't make it right. I'm not saying that. I'm just saying that I can imagine for some people it's easy to say no, and for others it's easy to get to a point where it's seen as just another question - and doesn't register as a black & white moral test. Maybe it’s post-modern relativism. Maybe it’s just different people being different. Obviously people who make the decision to cheat – by that very fact – cannot be right or on solid moral ground. But I can understand how they might get there.
- Mike, SLC

June 09, 2011

@Rapha - Who has gone to jail for taking EPO? I'm not certain, but I think it's only been recently (and only in Italy and/or maybe Spain) that sporting fraud is considered a crime. Nice straw-man you've got there... It's not like Millar's DS told him to rob a bank or shoot someone. Millar was NEVER going to go to jail for doping, he was just in danger of losing his job.
- Chris, LRAR

June 09, 2011

Sorry, fellas, but let me be clear: if what I'm doing could land me in jail, where I can produce no income--not even a minimum wage--then it isn't any good. I do get tired of "Cycling is all these men can DO, what would they DO without CYCLING...." Say what you might about pontificating from the ivory tower of my lowely computer, but I'll say that one night in jail will change your tune... just as it did mine. And as far as testing... well, sure, but fraud laws predate several drug tests for not-yet-banned substances. Sorry fellas, but I remain unmoved and unconvinced by your line of argument: And when my boss tells me I must break the law in order to 'redeem' the business, I walk. Anything less is simply David making a dime off of his excuses, however valid they may seem.
- Rapha, Overpriced Villa

June 09, 2011

Perhaps you meant 2001, when Millar did in fact DNF the tour. Ironically, the EPO test was implemented in '02ish, so Millar never got to bask in the glory years of epo.
- K, NY

June 09, 2011

"It was in 2003 that Millar finally become victim to the arc of his success. He abandoned the Tour de France in the Alps after a week of exhausted struggle." No he didn't. He won the final TT in the rain with a massive tailwind, didn't he?
- Philip, Cockermouth

June 08, 2011

You lost me at "Vaughters", but a tip of the cap for the selection of your opening quote. And, I have to say, DM mentioning his crossover point, "I opened my mind and let it in", reminded me of so many references in literature when "The Choice" - for whatever reason - is made. Profound, indeed. More like this to come, I trust.
- Matthew, In Purgatory at the moment

June 08, 2011

Is this to imply that Millar didn't dope (or at the very least, use EPO) before July 2003? That would be an irrational position to take, as Millar was 3rd overall at the 03 Dauphine among some very prolific dopers. If anything, I'll read the book just to see how he explains his performance.
- K, NY

June 08, 2011

Pretty soon, the answer to "Where is Lance?" will be "In court".
- PullyWullnutz, AwlpDooEzz

June 08, 2011

Where is Lance?
- Bobby Pimple, LRAR

June 07, 2011

"And when my boss tells me I must break the law in order to 'redeem' the business, I walk." - You walk . . . to where (if you are a Pro Cyclist)? It's like going to law school for 4 years and the only way to pass the bar exam is to dope ---- so you ask yourself do I want to be a money- making lawyer (cyclist) or do I find another career. Except a cyclist has skipped college, skipped a normal job, probably burned many personal relationships, what are the other career options?
- Skinny, Minneapolis

June 07, 2011

It's easy to be high and mighty without being in their position. 1.) These guys devoted their lives to this sport. 2.) There was no effective testing to catch cheats. 3.) Doping was an unsurmountable advantage. You can sit at your computer and talk about how you would have walked away. I don't buy it, but good for you. Question for everyone to consider: If you can't test for a banned substance, is it right to ban it? I think that puts everyone in an awkward position. It's effective testing that protects clean riders. Let's all cross our fingers that the effectiveness of testing outpaces advances in doping, because it's the only thing that will clean up sport--because armchair moralizing certainly won't.
- Nick, Santa Barbara

June 07, 2011

Sorry. I cannot buy the "I was weary" line of rhetoric that attempts to rationalize doping. And when my boss tells me I must break the law in order to 'redeem' the business, I walk. Is it an interesting story? I'm sure it is, and I'll probably read it. A legitimate argument to support one's actions, which included cheating and doping? Nope. "Just following orders" just doesn't work.
- Rapha, Overpriced Villa