Out of Stock
Item # SHI0261
2012 This model is no longer in stock.
Don't worry though, we have a lot more Road Cranksets in stock than that.
Shimano Ultegra FC-6700 Crankset - Double $0.00
With time your frame will come to terms.
Sure your bike’s one curvy, confident, carbon beast—but don’t expect that same arrogance when it sees you pull a new Shimano Ultegra FC-6700 Crankset out of the box. Once you slide the stupidly stiff axle into a free-spinning bottom bracket, this Ultegra crankset will become your bike’s new focal point. We all learned in kindergarten that what really counts is what’s on the inside—still true, and in Shimano’s case it’s nothing. Using the same mind-blowing Hollowtech chainring construction as Dura-ace, the dead-sexy Ultegra shares the insane stiffness-to-weight ratio and crispy shifts as its higher-end sibling—without the mind-blowing cost.
- Bottom Bracket sold separately
What community has to say
I have an FSA SL-K Light Compact Crankset...
I have an FSA SL-K Light Compact Crankset with MEGAEXO bottom bracket. Can I replace my crankset with this one and keep my bottom bracket?
I have an older Shimano 6600 set up. Will...
I have an older Shimano 6600 set up. Will this Crankset fit my Bottom Bracket.
Yes. If you have a double 6600 crank, your BB will work with the 6700 crank!
Will the FC-6750 be compatible with a 2011...
Will the FC-6750 be compatible with a 2011 Sram Red group?
Hi, is the 172.5 really available in 50x34?...
Hi, is the 172.5 really available in 50x34? I'm looking for a compact, and I believe I want the FC-6750, not the FC-6700 as it is labeled. I presume the 172.5 50x34 is the FC-6750 and not the FC6700?
Thanks a bunch
It is indeed the FC-6750 which is their compact designator in the Ultegra line. So if you are indeed looking for the 172.5 50x34 FC-6750 that is the one being offered above, we just built them all into this Ultegra sku on our site.
I have a Masi full carbon road bike with...
I have a Masi full carbon road bike with Dura Ace 7800 components and want to change my standard Crankset to a compact. I can't seem to find a Dura Ace 7800 compact crankset, 7900/7950's are available but I don't know if they are compatible or will I have to buy a bunch of components to fit my bike? Is there anywhere I could find just the 7800 "chain rings"or is there any other reasonable alternative?
If you want to stay with Dura Ace cranksets, you'll need to go to 7950 to get a compact. The 7800 series only featured standard double and triple cranksets. If you are still running a 9 speed cassette, you'll need to use a 10 speed chain in order for the new chain rings to upshift properly. Compact chainring are not backwards compatible as the bolt circle for standard is larger than the small chain ring of a compact set. Most SRAM and FSA compact cranksets are compatible with 9 and 10 speed Shimano components.
170, 50x34 ($165.00) is this model FC-6750...
170, 50x34 ($165.00) is this model FC-6750 compact?
Yes. the XX50 designation in Shimano Dura Ace and Ultegra equipment lines designates it as compact. If it ends XX00 it is standard, and XX03 means it is a triple.
Hi class hardware
All of my rides are faster with this crakset. I use a Chris King BB: http://www.backcountry.com/chris-king-road-bottom-bracket-ceramic-shimano#review-atg138058
Will this crank work with a BB30 bike? I...
Will this crank work with a BB30 bike? I know it's probably a stupid question but I have absolutely no idea.
It is compatible with adapters available from several manufactures. FSA, Wheels Manufacturing, Praxxis, and SRAM make adapters. That being said, I have heard several complaints from people using adapters that had creaking issues while under power. I do not know which brands (frame, adapter, cranks set combination) they were using.
I upgraded my Shimano 105 crank and BB to the Ultegra crankset and FSA ceramic BB. On average I gained .75 mph in speed. The stiffer crank arms and reduction in mechanical drag are an awesome difference : very SMOOTHE. In my last century of the season I improved my time by 25 minutes on a course that had 3200 feet of climbing.
Stiff, light, smooth, pretty (on the outside)
Couldn't beat the price on this crankset. I picked it to replace an old Sugino Mighty for which rings aren't widely available, much less those with newfangled shifting technology.
Out of the box, I wasn't that impressed. I'd not spent a lot of time looking at Shimano's cranksets and was surprised to see the hollowed-out backside of the star. That makes a great place for dirt to accumulate. And how could that deep, complex concave shape possibly be aerodynamic? The ultralight bottom bracket felt like a plastic imitation of a pro part, as did the hollowed-out spindle. That split in the left crank, with two bolts buried into recesses seems like it introduces a whole new set of opportunities for dirt to gather. I mean really, does everyone who likes a light, fast drivetrain spend the requisite amount of time cleaning their bike over a period of 20 or 30 years that these parts can be useful? Does my bike really have to be either a well-maintained racer or a no-time-for-maintenance-ride-in-any-weather commuter? Not if I have a choice in the matter. Gotta love that 20th Century engineering for durability and ease of maintenance.
And what's with the 8-spline crank arm adjustment cap? Has Shimano ever heard of a T60 torques pattern? Sure, the BBT-9 fits the dust cap, but the BBT-19 looks like a more professional tool and seems less likely to damage the 16 splines of the ultra-light outboard BB bearings, especially if the cups were seized a bit tight after being left in for a period of years and someone had access to neither a bike shop to do the job right nor a bike stand available to stabilize the bike during repairs. I wonder if Shimano makes a tool just for those dust caps, but the BBT-9 is the one that comes up most often in online searches, and the neither the specs nor the picture do a great job of explaining the latest trend in dust caps. Sorry, I know I shouldn't have slept through at least the past 20 bike shows, and didn't pay close attention to the "8 spline" phrase in the tool description, nor look at an exploded view of the crankset before I bought it, but I'm just sayin...
Installed and on the stand, I was still unimpressed. The sealed bearings of the Shimano Ultegra BB-6700 don't glide like old-school ball bearings -- not even those of an old BB with years of neglect. Fortunately, I know just enough bicycling science to recognize that bearing resistance is minimal compared to other factors -- especially rotating weight. With the new bottom bracket, compared to the old tapered spindle and steel cups, I lost about 134 grams - 15 percent of the crank weight, much of which is rotational weight. A 10-speed chain dropped another 20 percent of chain weight -- also all rotating weight.
It took a while to get the old Suntour Mountain derailleur bent back into shape so it wouldn't knock the chain off the right side in any gear combination, but once that was under control, it was time to find out what I'd bought into. Would I be able to feel the difference? I wouldn't know until I tried.
Once on the road, my opinion started to swing the other way. Not sure how much of it was reduced weight and how much of the difference was the more stiff crankarms, nor just how much less overall flex comes with the shorter Q-line fulcrum of the outboard bearing location, but it was definitely different. And of course it solved the chain-dropping problem I'd intended to fix -- that mostly because it was not bent like the chainrings and perhaps star arms of the old crankset. Not only did it end the mechanical stops to put the chain back, it shifted so smoothly with my well-adjusted derailleur and downtube friction shifters, I occasionally wondered if I'd shifted or just found my second wind.
With a set of Ksyrium Elite wheels that made the folks at one LBS cringe when I showed them the bike I was outfitting, this old roadbike is now fast as lightning. Speed is good, but for an older rider who can get aggressive, a drivetrain easy on the joints is also important. Overall, I was happy with my purchase.
As I worked through the gears during a few rides, I wondered if I'd have been happier with a compact crankset. I use a 34t rear cog, and find myself there slightly more often than I find myself in the 12t, which suggests my range is centered toward the low end of my gearing preference. However, I don't like to spin fast at high speeds in vehicle traffic. If there's any time to mash, that's it -- when one wants to maintain a very stable posture but still keep up speed. If it was available, I'd probably buy just the right side so I could switch from compact to full size chainrings as it suited me, but it's not so important that I'd buy another Ultegra crank at the regular price for the compact rings.
Oh, did I mention the excellent customer service at realcyclist? Sorry, LBS -- maybe you need to recruit me, cuz these online folks have the edge in that category for now. Maybe they're just not as threatened by customers who update their knowledge by shopping. Maybe the LBS mechanics-slash-salespeople need to keep moving through service tickets and have little time to chat about parts choice -- especially when they don't have those parts in stock. Maybe it's easier to come off as friendly when they have more inventory to select from and maybe it just makes them seem friendlier when they can say "free shipping to your door" rather than "pay now and come back next week after we unpack our shipment." I suspect, though, that it's easier to critically discuss after-market parts choice when there's no risk the conversation will be overheard by a nearby customer considering the new bike purchase that could make or break that day's sales.
Stiff. Crisp. Smooth. Attractive.
New Ultegra crankset is much improved. Extremely stiff. Crisp shifting. Nice looking as well.
Still have to go Dura-Ace to get 177.5 crank arms, however.
Shimano did a good job with the new crankset and chain ring design. you can feel the power through the cranks. Just make sure you never wash it with purple power.
i have an ultegra compact and want to...
i have an ultegra compact and want to change to double, do i have to change the bb? is it possible to buy the rings only?
If what you want to do is put a 53X39 on you compact crank, it is not possible because compact crank chain rings radius is 110mm whlie the double is 130mm. The BB works the same.
Stiff, Smooth Cranks
These cranks have a great stiffness all around with there design from there arms to the rings. They also have a great feel to them when you shift them. Also they look great on any bike.
In the "Tech Specs:" on the right it says...
In the "Tech Specs:" on the right it says "Bottom Bracket: Included", in the description above the last bullet point say "Bottom Bracket sold separately". What should I expect if I order?
The TECH SPECS are wrong the BB is not Included on Shimano Road Cranks.
Will this fit my 2006 Fuji Team pro? I...
Will this fit my 2006 Fuji Team pro? I have a compact crank on there now.
Yes, but since you don't have a Shimano crankset now you will need replace the bottom bracket with the BB-6700 as well.
You'll need any brand bottom bracket that is Hollowtech II compatible, not necessarily the Shimano BBR60. Most Fuji bikes I have seen already use Shimano components so you should be good to go. I use a third-party ceramic set that is pricey, but incredibly smooth and will outlast any non ceramic set on the market. Make sure you know what type of bottom bracket your frame requires (press-fit, English BB68, etc).