WHAT'S NEW

Previous What's New articles

Our 2009 Paris-Roubaix Awards

"It was the heat of the moment. Telling me what your heart meant…"

What's more embarrassing: Is it the fact that the lyrics and the power chords from Asia's ancient & godawful song are still so easily in mental reach? Or is it the very act the song commemorates -- pillow talk -- that arouses self-conscious shame? After all, who hasn't been stung tomorrow by today's confessional tenderness?

I'm now nearing 40. Pillow talk at this point consists of "Do you want me to drive the kids to school tomorrow?" Momentary effusions of vulnerability are rarer than rare which is why the 2009 Paris-Roubaix was such a remarkable experience. I made full use of my cycling.tv subscription this past Sunday and was up at 6:30am to watch the final 140km's in its entirety. And no doubt we're all experts by now at what unfolded and by the end I was exhausted but thoroughly sated with joy. The race played out like a classic in every sense of the word, in my mind matching the thrill of my all-time favorite edition, the 1997 victory by Frédéric Guesdon.

I was like a teenage girl, unable in my overwhelming delight to be self-reflective. Rather I felt a primal compulsion to email and call and text everyone I knew, What a race! I gushed. And then the elders started to speak. People for whom I have great respect (some of them current members of the professional peloton) replied to me with a similar line of thinking: "Not much fun to watch a bike race get decided by crashes," which echoed the single comment The Almighty Lance made about the race, "Watched Roubaix and the Masters. The Masters was more exciting actually."

And with that, I felt like a total dork. I can't deny it: I was on the edge of my seat for the last 2 hours of the race; the crashes in the Carrefour de l'Arbre literally had me shrieking at my computer; and the Boonen vs. Pozzato pursuit race over the last 15km was déjà vu of Tchmil vs. Musseuw in '94 and the suspense had me pretty much peeing in my pants. Wegmueller and his fateful Ziploc bag in '88. The Tchmil vs. Moncassin slug-fest in the shadow of the velodrome in '97. Over cocktails sometime let me recite to you my all time top-20 moments in Paris-Roubaix. The last 20km's of '09 seemed like a lock for the top-3. And then the elders spoke and I was thunderstruck with self-contempt. It wasn't just my fully-amped need to share, but it was the purity I felt in my thrill…Dammit, don't I qualify as an elder by now? Why didn't I assimilate the race in the same way they did?

So now, 48 hours later and newly trained at the priority of being cool, a quick set of awards for the 2009 Paris-Roubaix:

- The Karma Police Award: Team Saxo Bank. Two caveats: (1) I am a huge Jens Voigt fan and I celebrate his victory earlier this year at Criterium International. (2) I am fully aware that the Ardennes Classics are right around the corner and the Schleck Bros. in particular live and die for those races. That being said, though, can it possibly get any worse for Team Saxo Bank? Criterium International aside, they've been horrendous this spring with zero in the way of consequential results.

Karma Police, where does that come from? If you watched the '09 Paris-Roubaix play out live, you would've noticed that Saxo Bank's big, bad move came with about 65km's to go when their remaining riders hit the front and did a team time trial leading into and through the final feed zone of the day. By Paris-Roubaix standards it's an unwise place to attack. It was smooth tarmac up to a gradual overpass and there could've only been two reasons for it: (1) They felt so desperately out-gunned by Quick Step that their best tactic was to deprive them of their final feed. (2) George Hincapie was off the back after a flat, and Stijn Devloder, too, was off the back after a bike change. Perhaps they saw it as an easy means to flick two favorites with minimal effort.

Perhaps I'm being naïve in thinking that an attack in a feed zone or after a mechanical is a no-class move. But it seemed super-lame as the attack unfolded…which made me think there was a divine reason why only one Saxo Banker ended up in the top-10. 10th, to be exact. At 5:29.

The Dazed and Confused Award: Amateur bike racers sensitive to the idea of a code of honor on race day. I feel conflicted. Now that I've written it, I'm not so sure Saxo Bank's tactics as cited above deserve criticism. I'm conflicted because Tomke & Thor rightly threw down after crash #1 in the Carrefour de l'Arbre and Tomke (again, rightly) floored it after crash #2. I wonder if bike race etiquette (as it pertains to mishaps and their ramifications) is always subject to their circumstances --

* Demol didn't attack Wegmueller during the Ziploc bag incident in the '88 Paris-Roubaix.
* Ullrich didn't attack Armstrong and Hamilton played homeroom mom during l'affaire mussette in the '03 Tour.
* Schumacher won the '06 Eneco Tour after causing a crash that took out imminent-race-winner George Hincapie.

….And on and on. What's right, and what's wrong? My question, perhaps, is this: Is there consistency to the unwritten rules about when it is & is not permissible to attack? Is it cool to use any of these occasions as a reason to attack? Maybe I just need a re-education. Maybe Saxo Bank was genius,

* At a feed.
* When a rival has a flat.
* When a rival has a mechanical (non-flat variety).
* When a rival crashes.
* When a rival takes a nature break.

- The Most-Quotable Award: Leif Hoste. Our all-time favorite quote from Paris Roubaix is from Team Mapei legend Johan Museeuw several years back. During a pre-race interview with Paul Sherwen he said "To win Paris-Roubaix you must have the legs and you must have the lucky." And we've spent many years since trying to track down the lucky. Leif Hoste, he of eternal bad luck in the cobbled classics, was raging at the finish: "Flecha ruins my race first of all when he wasn't pulling and acting stupidly. Then he was able to attack, and in the end it turned out he wasn't even able to steer…." Honesty in the media is so rare. Up against banal Twitter tweets and PR-firm vetted press releases, Leif Hoste is a breath of fresh air.

The Human, All too Human Award: Jin Long. Velonews.com picked up on a neat article from the AFP about Team Skil-Shimano's one-and-only Chinese rider. Given China's totalitarian habits, I dunno how often Long gets exposed to the Euro peloton, but stories like these are always eye-opening. We've gotta give Skil-Shimano props for supporting him, and for backing Asia's most prominent member of the ProTour, former Discovery rider Fumiyuki Beppu of Japan.

The My Eyes Are Playing Tricks On Me Award: Tom Boonen. The accident where the moto plowed into the crowd at 63km to go was enough to make anyone's stomach turn. The Youtube videos show that Boonen looked back once, then twice, no doubt to see if any of his rivals hit the deck. Can anyone find a bit more extended footage of this? The reason I ask is that I have a clear recollection in the live coverage of feeling like Boonen held up on his attack right after the moto incident -- like for a moment his race stopped because he realized the gravity of what'd just occurred. I suppose maybe he was just easing up to recover after his attack. But when it went down live, I caught a vibe that it wasn't that at all.

Best PR Award: Cervélo. For a year and a half Cervélo has wrestled with how to effectively promote their RS frameset model. It resembles their super-popular (and 2-time winner of Paris-Roubaix) R3 model, but it has a longer wheelbase and a taller headtube. Since promoting a bike's stability (long chainstays) and inherent comfort (higher handlebar) tends to emasculate a bike in the eyes of shallow racer snobs like yours truly, Cervélo struggled to position as an authentic race bike. Last year they swore to their dealers we'd see Team CSC on the RS from time to time, and we'd see the team's tallest rider, Allan Johannsen, on it with great regularity. But the team never rode it once and Johannsen retired mid-season and it continued languish. And then, voila!, the Cervélo Test Team came out in full force on the RS in the '09 Paris-Roubaix. To see powerhouses like Thor Hushovd and Heinrich Haussler killing it on the RS even for just one day -- it's Midas-like. The team had 4 placings in the top-15, and from here forward the RS has the imprimatur of full-on legitimacy as a race bike.

And a few random things here not directly related to Paris-Roubaix:

- The race immediately on the Wednesday between Paris-Roubaix and the Amstel Gold Race is Antwerp's Grote Scheldeprijs. Surely you saw the final 1km…right? And in terms of a photo = 1,000 words, here you go.

- Nick Nuyens' Giant at Ghent-Wevelgem. Is this to keep a seat clamp bolt from pushing upward into the saddle shell where his rump can feel it come through? Seems like an awfully thick piece of wood to accomplish that, no?

- We've been silent on the economy and the world of bike racing of late -- mostly because the racing's been so good, not because the economic news ain't happening. Did you hear about Astana and their (lack of) payroll? This reads like a companion piece to recent articles about Kazakhstan's cratering economy.

- Have you seen this trailer for an upcoming movie about George Hincapie? I loved the trailer, and I was lucky enough to see the rough cut of the full film last weekend. It's exactly what it purports to be: An 80-minute conversation with George. Think of it as akin to My Dinner With Andre, but it takes place on a training ride to Caesar's Head. We're being told it'll be available for sale by the end of May. Do yourself a favor and grab the DVD when it comes out.

Share this Page Share this Page


Add a Comment (Comments are limited to 2500 characters)



Your First Name and Hometown



What is seven plus five?


 

April 23, 2009

Slight correction to my previous comment. They were Road Tubeless clinchers, not Tubeless Ready clinchers.
- REG, Dogpatch

April 23, 2009

Technical note from Paris-Roubaix... The whole Française des Jeux team rode Hutchinson Intensive Tubeless Ready clinchers, Yes, clinchers. First ever for a complete team to be riding clinchers in a top category pro race.
- REG, Dogpatch

April 21, 2009

How about this for a coincidence...I had read your article about Paris-Roubaix the other night and was enjoying the recolection of the Wegman plastic bag incident. Well, the next morning I went out for a ride and was flying down a hill when I saw a plastic bag wafting about in front of me. Wouldn't you know it, it got caught on my rear derailleur! I made sure not to pedal so the damn thing wouldn't get sucked in and affect my "sprint" to the coffee shop! In an unrelated matter, I have seen several advertisements to visit Arkansas in magazines lately and there's a picture of a man on a bike in Competitive cyclist kit in the front! Lucky circumstance? Advertising dollars? or Mover and shaker in Arkansas? Curious people would like to know!!!
- James, Portland, OR

April 21, 2009

Great quote from Hoste. I'd be a bigger fan of his if he foiled Hincapie's chances in the 2006 Tour of Flanders. They were riding on the same team and he attacked and dropped him while working with Boonen.
- Jeff, Culver City, CA

April 20, 2009

Wood? At high cadence 110-120 my ass bounces too much on my Selle Itialia, let's call it ABR, ass bounce resonance, maybe he has a big butt like mine and does not want the bouncing, Idunno???
- Steve, Reno

April 20, 2009

I am suprised you did not mention the growing issues with the Hooligans. Carrefour de l'arbre was a mess, Pozzato was lucky he got out alive, it could have been very dangerous for him.
- Mark, Toronto

April 20, 2009

Amateur race attacking guidelines: In a feed? Carrying enough fuel is part of racing. Don't need a bottle? Don't slow down. Mechanical? They're probably not catching back on anyways. Crash? Keeping your bike upright is part of racing. Pissing? You shouldn't be trying to pee when it would make sense to attack. Applying the unwritten rules of pro cycling to amateur races doesn't make any sense. Those unwritten pro rules usually only apply to the biggest riders at the Tours. It's racing. Point A to Point B, first one there wins.
- joe, portlnd

April 20, 2009

the george movie underlines even more what a mess this year's columbia jersey is
- brian, isle of islay, scotland

April 20, 2009

the last 30 km of this year's Paris Roubaix I could hear the scary music and voice over guy in my head from "A Sunday in Hell". Masters was lame... I have a love hate with golf... currently I hate. I still like Lance regardless.
- Tom, Greenwich, CT

April 20, 2009

'88 PR - one of the few things that I remember about that race was Demol sitting in the entire day. Seeing him suck wheel even while Wegmueller's mechanical hung out a car window, trying to pull the bag out of derailluer, was sickening.
- John, Chicago

April 19, 2009

A couple of comments. First, I thought it was a great race and extremely exciting. Second, it's a little hard to imagine an ambassodor of the sport claiming the Masters was more exciting. I mean, this is P-R! Just watching the peleton go over these roads sends chills down my back. As far as karma goes, didn't USPS (and by extension, GH) attack on a relatively flat stage when one of the Spanish climbers went down (Iban Mayo?) on pave in the TDF, effectively eliminating that competitor in the first week? I mean, I really want to see George win, but it seems that Boonen was out front far longer than anyone else I noticed and deserved the win this year. He was the strongest rider on the strongest team.
- Rick , West Palm Beach

April 19, 2009

"hincapie jeans now in stock" - "podium wear you'll want to wear". Dear Competitive Cyclist marketing department, When's the last time someone told you about "podium etiquette"? Ok, let me make this more simple - when's the last time either of the following two things happened: 1. a professional (real professional) wore jeans on a podium? 2. an amateur wore jeans on a podium and didn't look like an idiot? answer for both - never. jeans and podiums in cycling are like oil and water. might I recommend: "Hincapie Jeans - now in stock" - "don't let your steaze stop while you're rocking the local crit, stay on the "attack" after you wipe your b**ls with a towel in the back seat of your 1996 BMW 5-series" note: "steaze" is the combination of style and ease.
- Mance Jarmstrong, Little "you actually live there?" Rock

April 19, 2009

Don't feel like a dork - you were right to thoroughly enjoy the 09 P-R edition. From Arenberg to the end, Boonen did a lot of time up front. It was primarily his repeated accelerations that whittled down the field. Wasn't DeVlaeminck who said that riders who crash towards the end of Roubaix are doing so because they aren't as strong? Of course, you can have something completely random happen to even the strongest, but look at the still shot on pezcyclingnews.com of Thor's crash behind Boonen. Boonen is still fresh and strong, picks the right line. Thor is likely exhausted, doesn't follow Boonen on the right line, moves off the camber, slides out. Boonen was the strongest, he did his time up front, he whittled down the field and attacked repeatedly, crashes or otherwise.
- Marco, Toronto

April 19, 2009

"Wegmueller and his fateful Ziploc bag in '88." So, I'll freely admit that I forgot my canvas shopping bags at the house this morning, leaving King Soopers with my fruit and other Sunday morning goodies in plastic bags that looked a lot like the one stuck in Wegmueller's derailleur (mouthful, that). But after watching that clip again I've vowed not to let it happen again Just doing my part. "you must have the legs and you must have the lucky" True about the Paris Roubaix, true about the life. Hincapie trailer: I was over it 10 seconds in. Sure it's going to be worth watching, but that trailer: annoying.tv.
- matthew, west and north

April 18, 2009

Ah "the elders started to speak" Elders yes, wise probably not, egoists more likely. Like most ignoramus they provide verbal/brain diarrhoea when sought to provide few a scrapes of commentary. They crave their former recognition and glory and take a request bestowed on them as a opportunity to step up on the dais. Your joy in this event should remain unsullied by their need to appear to be experts. Chance is far more prevalent than most people are prepared to acknowledged and their knowledge of cognitive dissonance is non existent. Crashes ARE part of PR. Crashes and contingency make it a far more real event than all 7 years of a contrived Tour put together.
- peter, sydney

April 17, 2009

I'll be saving my allowance for that Hincapie DeeVeeDee Looks and sounds fascinating. Too bad George didn't bag the elusive P-R win this year. Would have been a nice way to complement this movie. Cervelo RS as a real race bike? Nah, somebody on the Test Team must have screwed up and took the wrong bikes to P-R. Just kidding...maybe the idea of a slightly more "refined" but performance-oriented bike will catch on.
- PawleeWalnutz, NYC

April 17, 2009

Regarding etiquette in P-R; it is the one race that all bets are off when a competitor flats/crashes. The race is partly one of survival, and they all flat and almost all crash. I think the demands of the course level the playing field and they all know the rules. Attacking feed zones, uncool. Attacking pee breaks, uncool. Didn't JaJa loose the yellow jersey once off the back peeing when someone attacked? Patrons used to control that in the old days. Slowing down when someone crashes out of a break? Some good examples out there with LA and JU. Can depend on the situation. Does anyone remember when LA said after watching the tape of the mussett incident that Ulrich did not let up? What about when same guy attacked the yellow jersey on a wet sea weed covered passage when half the peloton crashed and stopped.
- Fausto, Chatham

April 17, 2009

As someone who has never raced a bike, please allow me to weigh in on when it is appropriate and not appropriate to attack in a bike race. * At a feed. -- Not cool. Everyone is slowing up to refuel to make a better race for everyone. Think of the FANS MANNN! * When a rival has a flat. -- Not cool. In the PRO peloton a flat is a relatively quick fix (esp with neutral support), so I don't know how much would gain from an attack in that situation. Why not relax and let the guy come back so he can take some pulls? * When a rival has a mechanical (non-flat variety). Grey area. Snapped hill on a cobbled climb a la Cancellara? Move on dude get yourself a gap. Catastrophic frame failure? That guy probably has bigger problems. Move on dude get yourself a gap. A derailleur issue that necessitates a quick bike switch... Maybe you should slow up so he can take some pulls or at least not rub it in his face. * When a rival crashes. Grey area but probably OK. In a race speed crash it seems like it's a 50/50 shot that the guy will get back in the fight. Why slow down to watch a guy get into an ambo? Hammer down and try to get away from the muck. * When a rival takes a nature break. Not cool. I'll give you the .pdf link (http://redyak.com/rants/EP/Everybody%20Pees%20BW.pdf) so you can use your imagination, but the entire field will come across this problem at some point so don't... wait for it... be a DICK! Now, as someone who has never actually raced a bike obviously I don't know everything. However, as a spectator I think these are some good guidelines, but feel free to improvise as the race develops.
- John, DC